I don't think all that many people would hear about the case. The smart thing to do, for the artist, is to message SimBro's dev and explain that he doesn't want his music used in a product that is making money without his consent, then explain how they could work out a deal and if they don't come to an agreement he will be forced to take legal action.Ungawa Wrote:I HIGHLY doubt someone is going to go through the process of legal procedures for a sex game whereupon the returns on such pedantry and negative feedback won't do more than promote more people to the use of the music...
That's not only extremely reasonable and fair, but if it did come to legal action no half-decent person would actually blame the music artist for doing that. You need to protect your work from being stolen. Maybe all he needs is to be advertised and he'll accept it. If all the fans of SimBro get directed to the musician, that's not so bad.
But you can't say it's somehow bad or unreasonable to not want people to steal your art and make money with it.
And before you say the music isn't what's earning the money:
- If the music didn't matter, it's no problem to remove it.
This isn't a huge mistake on SimBro's side either. They liked the music so tossed it in. Not everyone thinks so critically of something like that. No one in this situation is a bad person.
I didn't even realise this game had music. I think I turned it off day 1 of finding the game and forgot.