Could a profile view be sexy?

[-Soloid-]

Hi there.
I was questioning myself recently about adult art.
And I was wondering :
Could only profile view be attractive and sexy in adult art?
Do you think 100 pictures with profile view could be boring? Why? Why not?
Do you think it could be an easy way to show something?
Do you think creating a database with profile characters could be used for something?

Tell me your opinions about it, I'm very interested in this.
Thanks.

[Lucky777]

Profile view?

Like, sideways-on?

That's never going to be as sexy as full-frontal and full rear view, since the visual stimuli just aren't there.

[QuizmasterBos]

Profile view?

Like, sideways-on?

That's never going to be as sexy as full-frontal and full rear view, since the visual stimuli just aren't there.

I disagree. Ever heard of the sideboob? Incredibly sexy. There is plenty of visual stimulus, the only thing that generally isn't very visible would be the genitals.

I am not too sure about nothing but profile view, I'd like a bit of variety. Of course, I can't say much since I don't know what I am supposed to be imagining here. Just pictures of profile view?

[-Soloid-]

Well...
As you know, LoK is based on a cheating perspective. It's a sort of profile view. Why, could you ask? Because, even if we can see both boobs and legs at the same time :

01.png (161.39 KiB) Viewed 1045 times

The head remains a profile view AND, most of all, the movements cannot imply depth rotation. For example, you cannot create a picture where Krystal's knee is closer to us, because her current leg has a certain size, and could not change it.
I was thinking about that yesterday. Only 3D can create images with complexes movements, such as depth rotations. Making 2D pictures imply to redraw every position if you're not in profile view. You have to draw each parts for the right global position.

So why am I really asking this?
I'd like to create a kind of database, with characters and stuff I could reuse to compose images more quickly and easily.
I know it sounds like anti-creation, but it's just a reflexion :

Could we think about a system that allows to create H-images reusing body parts and objects, without being boring, systematic or repetitive?

That's the point.
I didn't thought about the lack of visibility on the genitals. Good point.

[QuizmasterBos]

Well...
As you know, LoK is based on a cheating perspective. It's a sort of profile view. Why, could you ask? Because, even if we can see both boobs and legs at the same time:

The head remains a profile view AND, most of all, the movements cannot imply depth rotation. For example, you cannot create a picture where Krystal's knee is closer to us, because her current leg has a certain size, and could not change it.
I was thinking about that yesterday. Only 3D can create images with complexes movements, such as depth rotations. Making 2D pictures imply to redraw every position if you're not in profile view. You have to draw each parts for the right global position.

So why am I really asking this?
I'd like to create a kind of database, with characters and stuff I could reuse to compose images more quickly and easily.
I know it sounds like anti-creation, but it's just a reflexion :

Could we think about a system that allows to create H-images reusing body parts and objects, without being boring, systematic or repetitive?

That's the point.
I didn't think about the lack of visibility on the genitals. Good point.

Alright, I don't see why we can't think of a database. However, the purpose on this seems to still be quite vague in my opinion.

So, where would this be used for?
How would you make the picturee? Create a bunch of separate bodyparts and splice them together?
Do you want the pictures to be correct from the point of view we are seeing? Meaning that the bodyparts would all be located where they should be if we'd look at a similar object from that angle in real life?

So, can you answer these questions to give us some more insight?

[Ivan-Aedler]

I'm really interesting in this, Soloid.
For example, in MIM PUT, I have 5 poses so far. I want to have 6 or even 7. So I can , say, make the character make a '360' with more realism , even using only 2d sprites.

As for Profile view...this one IS a profile one (back profile), and I love it

(BOTTOM LEFT pic)
viewtopic.php?f=34&t=3099&start=20#p201074

[QuizmasterBos]

I'm really interesting in this, Soloid.
For example, in MIM PUT, I have 5 poses so far. I want to have 6 or even 7. So I can , say, make the character make a '360' with more realism , even using only 2d sprites.

As for Profile view...this one IS a profile one (back profile), and I love it

(BOTTOM LEFT pic)
viewtopic.php?f=34&t=3099&start=20#p201074

Profile view isn't that, Ivan. It means from the side. Like when Peach walks in MiM PUT. That view we have of her is called profile view.
The link you provided is just a back shot.

[OwnerOfSuccuby]

About profile view - is Corta Charecter Templates some kind of it ?

[BlueLight]

So from the stand point of space and extra bandwith I dis agree with this idea. I could see ways of getting around space but band with.

[-Soloid-]

So, where would this be used for?

Just images. I'm just wondering at the moment. I have no final product to create, except an image.

How would you make the picturee? Create a bunch of separate bodyparts and splice them together?
Do you want the pictures to be correct from the point of view we are seeing? Meaning that the bodyparts would all be located where they should be if we'd look at a similar object from that angle in real life?
So, can you answer these questions to give us some more insight?

This is exactly what I meant. Thanks for explaining it better.

Tried something quickly :

With 17 objects we could have a working basic human body.
Do you think this kind of sideviews poses could be, as I said, non-boring, -non-repetitive and sexy?

[QuizmasterBos]

So, where would this be used for?

Just images. I'm just wondering at the moment. I have no final product to create, except an image.

How would you make the picturee? Create a bunch of separate bodyparts and splice them together?
Do you want the pictures to be correct from the point of view we are seeing? Meaning that the bodyparts would all be located where they should be if we'd look at a similar object from that angle in real life?
So, can you answer these questions to give us some more insight?

This is exactly what I meant. Thanks for explaining it better.

Tried something quickly :

mechanics.jpg

With 17 objects we could have a working basic human body.
Do you think this kind of sideviews poses could be, as I said, non-boring, -non-repetitive and sexy?

I think this could be used quite well. Men are easy to please, so this shouldn't be a problem. I mean, we can look at a single picture and get turned on. So In my perspective, I'd say do it.

Of course, it would be a lot sexier if it was actually animated, but from what I can understand you aren't thinking of that... yet.

[-Soloid-]

Yup.
I totally don't have any goal with it for the moment.
Thanks for your opinion.