Furries and humans

[Csbears]

...Should you ever reconsider editing your post to take out the pictures remember do not screw with the [Quote] at the start.

It goes beyond for or against having them in the game because if the game "does it right" you won't be taken out of the experience and it might make you want to play even more. Conflict in games is the focal point in playing them, without conflict there is no drive, and without any drive you might think about shutting off your Pc / 360 / Wii and actually going outside. A compelling war on either side ( or remaining neutral ) could add depth and perspective to an already good game. It could add quests, mini-games, storyline, main characters, and more overall play time and if you naysayers look at just the facts I presented and not your biased opinion you'll find what I say more agreeable. *Red Dead Redemption SPOILERS* Look no farther than what RDD did with the Texas / Mexico rebellion...you started off helping the Mexico army against the "crazy" rebels, then you helped the rebels fight the "Corrupt" Mexican Army, all the while you see cut scenes showing that neither side is very different because they both want more disposable women & more power. At the end they gave you what you were after, they got what they were after, and you skedaddled the hell outta Mexico. *END SPOILERS* That actually happened during that Era...IRL the guy leading the revolution was killed by his revolutionaries, which is kinda of funny because it was almost immediately after they had won. The only real hurdle would be to come up with a original idea to work the opposing characters into the game and how it would all progress the story.

[Haldor]

The only real hurdle would be to come up with a original idea to work the opposing characters into the game and how it would all progress the story.

Oh there's no lack of original ideas, the hard part is coming up with a good one

[dryingpole]

As far as furries go, I'm not a huge fan, but am more than willing to enjoy a well rendered one.

That said, I don't see the problem with humans and furries in the same universe/game. (Hell, if you recall the old game Cyberpunk, they actually had human to furry conversions as a potential cybernetic modification.) The big question to me is how "Compatible" the creatures end up being. I assume we're going to suspend disbelief as far as "Can they have sex" since that's the whole point, and I don't think we really need a long convoluted explanation of why there are humans and furries together... (The big thought in my perverted head is immediately, "who can knock up who?" but that's just my weird brain)

I don't however think that there should be MORE humans than furries in this one. Since the game is primarily based off a furry universe, a few humans for flavor would be great, but too much just ruins the great "Critter sex" vibe this game has going on.

[Rinzler]

I think it is wise to point this out: FURRIES ARE JUST A BRANCH OF THE MULTIPLE-SPECIES FORM(MORPH) KNOWN AS A "HUMANOID" (SEE THE WORD "HUMAN" ON IT? yeah, thought so... #$# sorry if i sounded like too much of an asshole #$#)

But I personally think this is just a spoiled child's request, no aggresion or meanful thoughts intended, but diversity is one of the few things that even on HUGE ammounts doesn't hurt anyone, if you dont like humans then just don't pay that much attention to their scenes but for the people who like it, its not fair to just cut them off if they were planned to be featured... I dont know I just feel like ripping off things that are not harmful nor bugging is pure stupidity - yeah, sorry-