Spoiler (click to show/hide):
Overall all you did in my opinion was prove you want to be right with everything you say and go to incredible lengths trying to prove you are right. Which basically shows you were treading on Fallacy grounds. Especially given that you diverted everything away to other "proofs" and such, making it seem even more like a fallacy. You also totally ignored my argument as well as one Smackman made right before your post it seems.
By the way as far as this goes:
"Okay now that I’ve proven what Smack said doesn’t make sense logically; I would like to state that it doesn’t mean it can’t happen. In fact, proving anything in deductive logic is hard because nearly anything you can thinking can’t work. “Is there coffee in the cup?” how can you prove that’s true, any second an alien could beam aboard the coffee, onto his space ship."
Can thinking? You are telling us smack doesn't make sense logically yet you are saying you can do a better job?
I can easily prove it's true or false by simply doing the obvious thing *Goes over to the coffee cup and looks inside* Huh..It either A. Doesn't have Coffee, or B. It does. Either way I win. End of story. The solution is usually found in the question in this case "Is there coffee in the cup?" Well is there? Check and see, if there's not then obviously there's not, if there is then obviously there is. Regardless of any alien interference or anything else. It doesn't make the fact that there is coffee or not in the cup more plain or evident when you look inside the cup. Timing doesn't matter because obviously if there's nothing in the cup a second later then the coffee isn't in there at the time. Doesn't mean it wasn't or was, but that wasn't the question so it doesn't matter.
Let's look at the current problem. "Did Smack in fact say anything to the effect-" of as you put it
"Would you jump off a 100 ft drop down on to sharp spears? If not i can claim your scared but it would be smart thing to do. Just because we're not brave enough to try it doesn't mean we should."
"lol everyones still too afraid to give up body wash and stuff though..."
Is all he said. You added everything else to make your own increasingly failing argument more insane to follow.
Honestly he never said ANYTHING that compared it to intelligence or anything of the sort. ALL he said was that people were afraid of it. PERIOD do you even read what he posts? Or do you just fling shit without knowing the direction you are throwing it?
I guess by your logic it would go something like this;
If Shit (S) is thrown south, it will eventually end up north, given the trajectory and the continually forced stream of continually unending shit (Or M for made up shit) then you take your assumptions (A) of how it will continue on going without seeing any mountains or trees or any obstacles since you don't listen to common sense. (C for common sense) We end up with..
If our calculations are correct-a-mun-do.
S X M = Logic / (C) =(A) derived from (S) = (S)
So it just equals Shit in the end.
All I have seen you do is waste your own time trying to prove Smackman wrong when obviously you are taking your own assumptions of his posts and meanings to an extreme beyond comparison and trying to make it seem like he's wrong when clearly you are trying to defend yourself in such a way that it's almost impossible to respond.
I find that Smackman was simply stating that people that do no try it because they are scared, and as Misty frog and I have stated the worse thing you can get is bad hair. END of story. Done, zipped tight, water under the bridge. So if he did carry the notion that they were idiots or stupid for it. Obviously there's two other people that are thinking along the same lines. WORSE THING YOU CAN GET IS GREASY HAIR FOR A FEW DAYS. For some people that's already the problem starting out so it's even more ridiculous.
You taking it to the madness levels you did just proves that you are trying to recover something that was never really there, Mainly your point about his views on things. I don't see how you know them any better then anyone else. I suggest you learn to listen and stop acting like a 16 year old that has serious angst.
In the end I still agree with Smack, while looking at your points I see where you are getting at... but you are missing the entire point. (I would explain but if you seriously can not see it from what's above then I don't think I can convince you any other way.)
I might not see eye to eye with him on a lot of things, but I am certainly not going to let someone come in and rip up someone for no better reason then to do so. Period.
What pissed me off the most though was not only you being extremely rude to Smack, but you totally derailed the thread. You came in, took a comment that totally wasn't aimed at anything and started ripping away at it for no good damn reason. If you really had a damn problem with it you could have pm'd him if anything and resolved it there, not openly slandering him. Saying that he was basically calling people idiots for something. EVEN if he was as I said before. I honestly agree with him. If you can not see that they are two different things you have some issues. If someone is honestly afraid of not shampooing or sudding up. THEY CAN LEAVE THE THREAD, or just not come in it in the first place, it seems STUPID and unintelligent to be afraid of not using a hair product, and body product for any amount of time.
Overall all you did in my opinion was prove you want to be right with everything you say and go to incredible lengths trying to prove you are right. Which basically shows you were treading on Fallacy grounds. Especially given that you diverted everything away to other "proofs" and such, making it seem even more like a fallacy. You also totally ignored my argument as well as one Smackman made right before your post it seems.
By the way as far as this goes:
"Okay now that I’ve proven what Smack said doesn’t make sense logically; I would like to state that it doesn’t mean it can’t happen. In fact, proving anything in deductive logic is hard because nearly anything you can thinking can’t work. “Is there coffee in the cup?” how can you prove that’s true, any second an alien could beam aboard the coffee, onto his space ship."
Can thinking? You are telling us smack doesn't make sense logically yet you are saying you can do a better job?
I can easily prove it's true or false by simply doing the obvious thing *Goes over to the coffee cup and looks inside* Huh..It either A. Doesn't have Coffee, or B. It does. Either way I win. End of story. The solution is usually found in the question in this case "Is there coffee in the cup?" Well is there? Check and see, if there's not then obviously there's not, if there is then obviously there is. Regardless of any alien interference or anything else. It doesn't make the fact that there is coffee or not in the cup more plain or evident when you look inside the cup. Timing doesn't matter because obviously if there's nothing in the cup a second later then the coffee isn't in there at the time. Doesn't mean it wasn't or was, but that wasn't the question so it doesn't matter.
Let's look at the current problem. "Did Smack in fact say anything to the effect-" of as you put it
"Would you jump off a 100 ft drop down on to sharp spears? If not i can claim your scared but it would be smart thing to do. Just because we're not brave enough to try it doesn't mean we should."
"lol everyones still too afraid to give up body wash and stuff though..."
Is all he said. You added everything else to make your own increasingly failing argument more insane to follow.
Honestly he never said ANYTHING that compared it to intelligence or anything of the sort. ALL he said was that people were afraid of it. PERIOD do you even read what he posts? Or do you just fling shit without knowing the direction you are throwing it?
I guess by your logic it would go something like this;
If Shit (S) is thrown south, it will eventually end up north, given the trajectory and the continually forced stream of continually unending shit (Or M for made up shit) then you take your assumptions (A) of how it will continue on going without seeing any mountains or trees or any obstacles since you don't listen to common sense. (C for common sense) We end up with..
If our calculations are correct-a-mun-do.
S X M = Logic / (C) =(A) derived from (S) = (S)
So it just equals Shit in the end.
All I have seen you do is waste your own time trying to prove Smackman wrong when obviously you are taking your own assumptions of his posts and meanings to an extreme beyond comparison and trying to make it seem like he's wrong when clearly you are trying to defend yourself in such a way that it's almost impossible to respond.
I find that Smackman was simply stating that people that do no try it because they are scared, and as Misty frog and I have stated the worse thing you can get is bad hair. END of story. Done, zipped tight, water under the bridge. So if he did carry the notion that they were idiots or stupid for it. Obviously there's two other people that are thinking along the same lines. WORSE THING YOU CAN GET IS GREASY HAIR FOR A FEW DAYS. For some people that's already the problem starting out so it's even more ridiculous.
You taking it to the madness levels you did just proves that you are trying to recover something that was never really there, Mainly your point about his views on things. I don't see how you know them any better then anyone else. I suggest you learn to listen and stop acting like a 16 year old that has serious angst.
In the end I still agree with Smack, while looking at your points I see where you are getting at... but you are missing the entire point. (I would explain but if you seriously can not see it from what's above then I don't think I can convince you any other way.)
I might not see eye to eye with him on a lot of things, but I am certainly not going to let someone come in and rip up someone for no better reason then to do so. Period.
What pissed me off the most though was not only you being extremely rude to Smack, but you totally derailed the thread. You came in, took a comment that totally wasn't aimed at anything and started ripping away at it for no good damn reason. If you really had a damn problem with it you could have pm'd him if anything and resolved it there, not openly slandering him. Saying that he was basically calling people idiots for something. EVEN if he was as I said before. I honestly agree with him. If you can not see that they are two different things you have some issues. If someone is honestly afraid of not shampooing or sudding up. THEY CAN LEAVE THE THREAD, or just not come in it in the first place, it seems STUPID and unintelligent to be afraid of not using a hair product, and body product for any amount of time.
On topic: Lol Oats Smackman? and nice Suraru.
that's interesting. I just lather my body with goat milk soap and that's about it now a days.
XD
