Workhorse Wrote:Who knew pubes would be such a divisive issue! Unfortunately I don't know how to do much in ActionScript so a toggle isn't possible at this time. Maybe I'll figure it out in a week or two. Maybe not. How about you guys send me your votes through PM just in case. Don't worry about the semantics of the issue, I just want to know if you find them sexually attractive.
Switching things on and off is fairly easy, just make it a symbol (graphic) then give it a name in its properties window, for this example I'll just use "pubes". This of course is assuming they are separate objects, if they're part of some other symbol then it gets more complicated.
If we still have the simple case then you just add a button with code like:
- Code: Select All Code
on (Release) {
pubes._visible = !pubes._visible;
}
Basically it just takes the visibility of the pubes and "flips" it from on to off.
Oh and nice scenes btw
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/110aa/110aa4e69d3e2c2ead17bfab3c854cda13a8a958" alt="Very Happy :D"
I think pubes are most contentious because of course animals don't have them as for mammals they already have fur, and lizards don't really have hair of any kind (though the females will usually have hair as it seems weird otherwise). I don't mind when artwork of mammals has an implied pubic area usually with emphasised tufts of fur, but on reptiles I think it looks a little strange, though I'm not personally put off by it.