slaughter house

A place for general discussions about anything and everything.

slaughter house

Postby BlueLight » Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:40 pm

What are the ethic practices that we should hold when it concerns animals?

This has been already stated in another thread.

Renara Wrote:
IrrelevantComment Wrote:How many people saying it is wrong are vegetarians? If you can happily raise an animal in a shit environment and kill it just so you can eat it, you cannot claim that an action that pleasures both individuals is "taking advantage".

It absolutely is, but the difference is that we know with certainty that it is against the animal's wishes and choose to overrule that for the sake of survival. Granted that side of things is wildly muddied given that we have people who eat when they don't need to, and many animals are farmed in conditions that are unnecessary, except to do it more cheaply by as a trade off for ethics.

Still, compared to bestiality the animal's wishes are well known and ignored for the sake of what is (mostly) a more important purpose; bestiality meanwhile is ignoring the animal's wishes, or intentionally manipulating them, for the sake of your own pleasure. I'm not sure that it's directly comparable.

I mean there is of course a whole discussion on whether we even need to eat meat anymore, given that a vegetarian diet can be farmed more efficiently (and more ecologically) in most cases, which means that eating meat is almost purely for pleasure in a lot of Western civilisation. But, that's a discussion for a different topic. Just with that in mind I want to clarify that I'm not a vegetarian, but I do avoid foods that I consider to have been unethically farmed.


Zeus Kabob Wrote:For example, Veal, amirite?

I love meat, and the way I see it, animals aren't any more hurt by the treatment they get than we project on them to be. Animals are incapable of forward-thinking, and they are incapable of communication. Considering the two of these, the only animal that I know of that is ever "hurt" while being slaughtered is pigs, as they have a dim recognition of the fact that they're going to die. Cows, sheep, and other livestock are not aware that they're going to die, and all slaughter is carried out with focus on making sure the animals don't feel pain.

You can say that we're "robbing them of their potential to be happy in a field somewhere", but they can't care because they can't know that there's something better (no communicative skills), and they don't have the capability to wonder about those things even if they had the knowledge of something better (underdeveloped frontal lobe).

Also, even if they were hurt I don't care, as I don't believe in the afterlife and I don't care about livestock because of their lack of care for me and their inability to communicate or make themselves and individual.
User avatar
BlueLight
Gangs n' Whores Developer
 
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:23 am

Re: slaughter house

Postby Suraru » Sat Apr 14, 2012 4:39 am

My views on hunting
Spoiler (click to show/hide):

I am all for controlled hunting seasons. Why? Well have you ever seen what happens to jack rabbits when they over populate?
Google it, because I am not going to relive through the all the mercy killingsMASS KILLINGS! we had to do.

The same thing happens with deer, elk, and just about every other animal open for hunting seasons. Also, we don't just go out and shoot animals, there are these things called tags, and they cost $20-$50 for deer. You are only allowed to shoot A (as in one!) deer in region specified on the tag, and it has to be of the certain type (buck, doe, whitetail, muley, etc). If you shoot the wrong animal, you get a huge ass fine if you don't have a tag for it.

And if you shoot an animal and leave it for dead, FUCK YOU!
Because its really hard to sneak past the county serifs with an untagged deer.


My views on meat eating
Spoiler (click to show/hide):

Meat is a required substance to survive properly. You could live without it, but it is unnatural to do so.
As long as the meat is obtained humanly, I'm fine with eating it.
"Thanks to your unfortunate life, I've found myself being more and more grateful!"

"Are you horny? Do you not want babies? Just watch porn!
They'll make you jizz in your pants, so others don't have to!"
Suraru
 
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 4:13 am
Location: Behind you.

Re: slaughter house

Postby talin » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:39 am

So long as we aren't torturing animals, we as predators, have a right to kill and eat other animals. We have adapted and evolved to become a dominate race and it is in our nature to use other animals for sustenance. When ever I do go hunting, it is mostly for food so I'm not going to shoot the scrawny 4x5 when there is a much larger 1x2 nearby that can provide more food. In the long run, it's cheaper than buying an equal amount of preprocessed steak/hamburger/jerky/other meats if I get a big one. As far as I'm concerned, all living thing have a right to fend for themselves. The only thing I don't condone is unreasonable torture.
What is a goal but an attempt to gain a purpose? We don't really want the goals and advancements for themselves, we want them because it gives us a reason to act.
RP DnD roller: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/dice/dice.htm
User avatar
talin
 
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 2:14 am
Location: Laptops can go almost anywhere.

Re: slaughter house

Postby Renara » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:27 am

Well I think there are two major ethical questions:

Firstly, is it "right" to battery farm purely to cut costs when it leads to cruel conditions for the animals? I'd argue no, and there are a bunch of reasons; ethically of course it's simply cruel, and unnecessary, except to promote the kind of cheap, fast-foods that aren't exactly benefiting society anyway. On a more pragmatic note, it's also a hotbed for disease, and one of the reasons that things like SARS was able to spread so quickly, which is just plain bad for everyone.

Secondly, is the question on whether we need meat or simply want it. It's arguable that most western civilisation doesn't need meat at all. There's no such thing as having the right to eat it; as predators (well, omnivores) we used to need meat to survive, which is fine, but when we no longer need the high protein, high fat content of meats when a vegetarian diet is now just as viable, do we really need it at all? Of course there are edge cases, as some places meat is the only viable food source, and harsher climates still genuinely need it due to extreme cold, remote location etc. There are other concerns as well; in particular, meat farming can be extremely wasteful, and is not ecologically friendly. Farming anything isn't exactly natural, but yields on crops can be very high, and provide a lot more of our nutritional requirements for the amount of resources required to produce them; it's harder work, and I for one just couldn't be happy on a purely vegetarian diet (I never got past hating vegetables ;)), but it's worth remembering that it's viable, given the right variety (since the protein is harder to provide).
Renara (team twitter | newgrounds)
Team Lead Programmer
Lok Team Member
Site Administrator
User avatar
Renara
Foxy Admin
 
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: slaughter house

Postby talin » Sat Apr 14, 2012 12:06 pm

You make valid points, "battery" farms are basically animal prisons and aren't healthy in several ways for anyone involved. I personally think if your going to farm an animal, you should at least give it a nice big field to run around in with it's herd so it isn't standing in a miserable stall all it's life, that's just unethical torture for the creature.

As for needing/wanting meat, I think that TECHNICALLY we don't need meat but it is a bit more difficult to sustain ourselves with only plants seeing as how most omnivores in general are used to a mix of both. Most plants don't have the same nutrients that the animals feeding on them do. We as omnivores are capable of creating those nutrients by eating plants ourselves due to some similar qualities shared in the way we digest things but not all of us can use plants to make the recommended amounts meaning that we need meat to cover the gap.

IMO, many empathize with our prey but the best way to go about it is to simply not be wasteful of the creatures who we eat. Treat them with some dignity but don't forget that death is often needed for life to be sustained. If you want the majority of humanity to be healthy, either accept we need meat to thrive or start working on genetic research to make us full blown herbivores.

(basically agreeing but elaborating/restating a bit with my own opinions mixed in.)
What is a goal but an attempt to gain a purpose? We don't really want the goals and advancements for themselves, we want them because it gives us a reason to act.
RP DnD roller: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/dice/dice.htm
User avatar
talin
 
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 2:14 am
Location: Laptops can go almost anywhere.

Re: slaughter house

Postby Renara » Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:23 pm

The main difficulty with sustaining the vegetarian diet is that there's not enough demand for it. Specifically, plants naturally produce one of the two proteins we need in food, while herbivores produce the other as a natural part of their digestion. So yes, in a way meat is the ideal complement for that other half. However, it's also naturally occurring in certain foods, specifically nuts, types of oats and (I think) soy, and you can actually get it more efficiently from these foods than through meat.

However, getting the right quantity of nuts etc. is very expensive, and the majority of them are only farmed for flavouring so they don't exist in enough quantity, not enough are produced locally so shipping adds cost and so-on. This is partly why modern vegetarians often use supplements since they're much more concentrated so once produced the cost is comparatively low; though in that particular case you actually end up trading ethical eating with regards to eating them for unethical treatment of foreign workers in the places that produce these supplements! If the nutritional side of things were more easily met however, then a vegetarian diet could actually be fairly affordable, possibly even more so given that meat can actually be pretty expensive.

There are also other health issues; western civilisation consumes far more meat than we should on average, and without the activity to counterbalance it its very easy to become overweight on that kind of diet. Meat also includes a fairly high concentration of toxins compared to plants; we can metabolise this, but only if we're eating appropriate amounts for our level of activity. It's perfectly possible to become a fat vegetarian as well mind you, but it'd currently cost an awful lot, but wouldn't have quite the same health problems so in theory it'd be easier to burn off with some work. So yeah, it's partly an issue of waste as you say, as animals are being killed that don't need to be, just so that a large number of people can eat more than they need to, which is definitely wrong, regardless of the vegetarian or not side of things.
Renara (team twitter | newgrounds)
Team Lead Programmer
Lok Team Member
Site Administrator
User avatar
Renara
Foxy Admin
 
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: slaughter house

Postby GoRepeat » Sun Apr 15, 2012 2:23 pm

Meat tastes good omnomnomnonomnomnomnomnom
Picarto LiveStream: https://picarto.tv/GoRepeat
Other Stuff: Click Here
User avatar
GoRepeat
Moderator
 
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:26 am
Location: Behind the Looking Glass

Re: slaughter house

Postby Zeus Kabob » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:16 pm

Wow, Renara, I had no idea that it was costly to be a vegetarian!

I guess I could kind of see that, as tofu always seems to cost more than I think it should, but that's still quite surprising.
User avatar
Zeus Kabob
Moderator
 
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:16 am
Location: Between some awesome thunderheads

Re: slaughter house

Postby Seleph129 » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:17 pm

In my opinion, killing animals for food is okay.
We do need animal meat to live a good quality life, and human interests are always a priority in any ethical arguments. On the other hand, humans are similar to animals in so many ways. So there will always be some guilt in that. Luckily for me, its not my job.
Seleph129
 
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 5:46 pm

Re: slaughter house

Postby Thee Pie Man » Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:28 am

My 9001 pennies;


@ the question.
Spoiler (click to show/hide):

Personally as far as ethics go I feel that we should and could treat the animals better period, if we are using them for our own gains in several different ways it's just as fair. Some may argue that we let them live as long as they do as "protectors" but honestly we are just eating them or harvesting what they normally would use for babies. (Aka keeping female cows lactating, and chickens away from roosters to keep their eggs unfertilized. Which may in it's own way be considered bad itself. All of that is besides the point of course.) I think if we are going to be "farming" anything which by doing so we are fattening up animals with corn and hormones and etc (Some Farms still do use hormones to create more meat and etc) We have the higher brains. Just because they don't realize what we are doing, how does that make it any better that we are doing it? Might as well be saying.

"Babies can't communicate with us. Do we butcher them? That yelling can get really annoying..."
So why should we feed them? Just to shut them up? But why? What makes us differentiate between an animal and another human being? Why is a human's life at any stage any more worth then another mammal? Is it the thinking of capacity of the child? That it can learn things that other animals can not? People can teach dogs to help people in need, when normally dogs would never do such a thing. Has anyone tried to do the same with cows, or chickens, or etc? I don't think so. Honestly we just see them as food so we don't even think about if they ARE capable of anything more then eating grass and producing harvestables. Most people just don't see what happens so they feel it isn't their problem. I am sure they would feel different if there was a war going on and it was brought to our homes, and all the cowardly leaders escape away while a bunch of citizens are stuck, using the same logic why would they care? They can't see the devastation. I would dare a bunch of people to watch "food inc" if they have not seen it already. It's pretty horrible. This is just my opinion on everything. If others have a problem with it I really don't want to hear about it because nothing they say is going to change my mind because morally this is how I feel about anything like this. I chose not to eat anything but Kosher as far as meats go. I don't eat out at fast food anymore I usually go with Kosher chicken. It's good stuff and affordable, with protein. As far as veggies go I take three cheap vitamins a day that are gummies for adults. I thought it was pretty cool. I don't have to eat veggies and they aren't pills.


@ Renara if anyone else want's to read it they can of course. Can't really stop you but it's directed at The foxy admin :3
Spoiler (click to show/hide):

Renara Wrote:Well I think there are two major ethical questions:

Firstly, is it "right" to battery farm purely to cut costs when it leads to cruel conditions for the animals? I'd argue no, and there are a bunch of reasons; ethically of course it's simply cruel, and unnecessary, except to promote the kind of cheap, fast-foods that aren't exactly benefiting society anyway. On a more pragmatic note, it's also a hotbed for disease, and one of the reasons that things like SARS was able to spread so quickly, which is just plain bad for everyone.

Secondly, is the question on whether we need meat or simply want it. It's arguable that most western civilization doesn't need meat at all. There's no such thing as having the right to eat it; as predators (well, omnivores) we used to need meat to survive, which is fine, but when we no longer need the high protein, high fat content of meats when a vegetarian diet is now just as viable, do we really need it at all? Of course there are edge cases, as some places meat is the only viable food source, and harsher climates still genuinely need it due to extreme cold, remote location etc. There are other concerns as well; in particular, meat farming can be extremely wasteful, and is not ecologically friendly. Farming anything isn't exactly natural, but yields on crops can be very high, and provide a lot more of our nutritional requirements for the amount of resources required to produce them; it's harder work, and I for one just couldn't be happy on a purely vegetarian diet (I never got past hating vegetables ;)), but it's worth remembering that it's viable, given the right variety (since the protein is harder to provide).


1. I second the no, I find it silly and morally upsetting for several reasons. Most you stated, I will add a few more from my side;
People just are lazy now adays, so they don't want to exactly be a Shepard of sorts to the creatures. Much easier to manage when they are all packed together like they are on most farms I have heard of. Just seems ridiculous that we are doing it to make MORE money (As far as not using it to make the fields and water them and etc, so more like saving but I call it making more since they do not have to maintain it.) Where does the money even go? If not to the betterment of the animals obviously then what? I just don't understand people anymore honestly :/ .

2. Well honestly animal fats are more healthy for you then plant fats. It has been discovered that wheat and plant/french fry oils in fast food is actually the main thing causing obesity (Almost everyone is biologically rejecting wheat, and the reason they are getting big is because it's actually an allergen that the wheat produces.) I could go to mcd's everyday for the rest of my life. Ex: Take off the Bun, don't eat the fries with the veggie oil. Eat the burger and veg, and eat a mc flurry. and as long as I don't get a lactose disorder or something I could maintain myself on that for a good amount of time. OF course I would drink plenty of water and it wouldn't be my only food. But I wouldn't even have to exercise more then most people do (few miles a day jogging, few push ups, few sit ups etc) Just basic things.
I however agree with you that since we aren't being "hunters" or "foraging" for food unless you are doing a sport like foot ball or something very heated like or even living in a cold climate as you said. You really are not needing the extra protein to build reserves. You don't really need all that extra stuff. Your body just disposes it like it never was there. (Note: I personally follow the primal diet examples, given what I have learned and researched it's much healthier to eat primal, meaning all those veggie oils that are supposedly good for you vs animal oils is Bull shit the government feeds us (literally) It and basically this stuff is bad for you including and not limited to; Wheat, Flour, and Gluten.)

Renara Wrote:The main difficulty with sustaining the vegetarian diet is that there's not enough demand for it. Specifically, plants naturally produce one of the two proteins we need in food, while herbivores produce the other as a natural part of their digestion. So yes, in a way meat is the ideal complement for that other half. However, it's also naturally occurring in certain foods, specifically nuts, types of oats and (I think) soy, and you can actually get it more efficiently from these foods than through meat.

However, getting the right quantity of nuts etc. is very expensive, and the majority of them are only farmed for flavouring so they don't exist in enough quantity, not enough are produced locally so shipping adds cost and so-on. This is partly why modern vegetarians often use supplements since they're much more concentrated so once produced the cost is comparatively low; though in that particular case you actually end up trading ethical eating with regards to eating them for unethical treatment of foreign workers in the places that produce these supplements! If the nutritional side of things were more easily met however, then a vegetarian diet could actually be fairly affordable, possibly even more so given that meat can actually be pretty expensive.

There are also other health issues; western civilization consumes far more meat than we should on average, and without the activity to counterbalance it its very easy to become overweight on that kind of diet. Meat also includes a fairly high concentration of toxins compared to plants; we can metabolize this, but only if we're eating appropriate amounts for our level of activity. It's perfectly possible to become a fat vegetarian as well mind you, but it'd currently cost an awful lot, but wouldn't have quite the same health problems so in theory it'd be easier to burn off with some work. So yeah, it's partly an issue of waste as you say, as animals are being killed that don't need to be, just so that a large number of people can eat more than they need to, which is definitely wrong, regardless of the vegetarian or not side of things.


1. and 2. Honestly I vote taking vitamins for most of the things besides what meat provides. I eat chicken, and turkey and etc. Although I have never heard of being able to get the proteins more efficiently from those things you mentioned. I will have to look it up. I believe though that meat is a better source for those things period. It's more natural for humans to gain them from meat then from what you stated. I will explain why; Primal diets and statistics show us that we farmed very little and hunted for mostly everything. Of course there would be berry picking and fruits and nuts (But not to the extent of it giving enough protein I am sure, and given that even in today's world we can hardly obtain things ourselves unless we have them imported from certain areas and etc. The point is we didn't harvest Oats and Soy, we didn't harvest nuts to the extent that is needed to sustain ourselves on such things. We ate meat, We ate fish. (fish is a good alternative to meat except for the mercury that's being discovered in many fish at dangerous levels. Causing many problems.) I don't see our ancestors using agriculture for a very long time. Regardless of how civilized we have become, we still have instincts. We still have certain preferences that are hardwired into our DNA (Such as big breasted woman with wide hips. Aka perfect motherly material, large birthing canal and milk sacks. and for woman it's a whole other ball park, but for the most part they like ripped guys that aren't overly muscly as they see them more of a threat subconsciously. But they want security as much as any other personality trait. I am not debating this really, or asking for other opinions I am just saying it as how I see the majority of the populace acting and from what I have learned.) and natural habits. (I like to think we have come past a lot of things, brutality being one of them, and compassion being something we have learned.) *Still feels Vitamins is a good way to get most of what you need for cheap. without killing little plants. D:

3.You are actually looking at it wrong as far as my beliefs and research shows Renara. It's really the breads and processed shit. Not so much the meat we consume. If anything we put more bread into our bodies then anything else, almost everything is breaded and deep fried, and almost everything has wheat in it which makes it a very annoying thing to pick out groceries that are gluten free, or ask for a gluten-free pizza (most places are doing it now which is pretty cool I think) I still eat wheat, I am not saying EVERYONE is completely allergic to wheat and some people may never notice anything. The point is that the people that are obese. Are most likely looking at the wrong problem, it's not the meat fats (which by the way are the healthiest) it's the fats that are not natural, that we process like veggie fats. (Yes butter is processed with animal fats sometimes but! It's still animal fat which makes it better for you then Veggie butter.) and I am not saying all veggie oils are bad. Olive oil is actually quite good for you, but it's not like people are going to use that for a lot of things. Doesn't bring out the same flavor in all the addictive foods that companies have spend millions of dollars endorsing, and the government spends reinforcing.

3/4Vegetarians that are fat are using veggi oiled butters and probably eating bread crumbs in their salad which directly makes them fat. If they minus those two things the SWELLING will go down. (My mom is the perfect example. She was a very large woman and almost died due to the inflammation of her tissue causing water to actually separate from her veins and if she didn't stop she would have drowned. She then stopped eating wheat completely. Started "deflating" as I saw it No lose skin or anything but it was just the way she seemed to "lose the weight" so fast.. she can run up the stairs. I never have seen her do that. Ever, it's the Gluten and the wheat :/ Government knows it too..That's why it's on the pyramid just another money racket. Then diet companies make a bundle selling shit to saps that think if they eat some bread with a dietary drink like slimfast they will lose weight. When really they :( )
Finally I would like to see where the meat contains MORE toxins then plants (including wheat) please Renara, if you happen to have some linkies I am now interested.

*Rants about corn syrup and a government conspiracy*
(Just as bad as those commercials for corn syrup. "It's just corn" Says the happy couple on their farm surrounded by acres of corn fields. I honestly laughed my ass off. Yes it's just corn that **Has been modified in a factory and processed about four or five different ways to my knowledge.** But really it's just corn people...Just...gooey form :D....not buying it. Honestly it's one of the worse things for your body as well. It's just in almost everything. We feed farm animals corn and we feed ourselves corn. WE are fattening ourselves up for a hypnotic race of aliens...the government is being controlled I tell you!! It's a conspiracy!! RUN RUN! We are all pigs and cows! RUN!)


@Talin, I would post things for you but it's covered in Renara's comments or I agree with you so there's not much of a point ^^

@ Gore. I wholeheartedly agree.
~Life is fragile thing, but also it can be hardening, it can be enduring, it can be sad, it can be happy. If things don't seem to be going your way at first, look forward and hold on to what you believe in, it can be one of the strongest things of all~
Thee Pie Man
 
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:25 am
Location: Dunken Donuts, "If they don't have pie I am killing someone."

Re: slaughter house

Postby Zeus Kabob » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:05 am

AGH! I'M SO PISSED OFF.

I feel like I hear the same thing every time I talk about farming animals.

Some farms might use hormones. If you give a shit, don't buy meat from the farms that do. Maybe people don't care if their meat is treated with rBST! In that case, get up in arms when you're buying, don't say "abolish all farming!".

As for the babies: If all I could ever hope for from a baby was wailing, then I'd kill it without a second thought. The fact of the matter is that cows will never be anything more than cows, whereas babies are very likely to grow up into adults who are capable of speech.

I feel like there are so many things that I could write essays about here, things that the majority of others in this thread are talking about that I disagree with, but that would be too much reading for you, I am too tired to do it, and it probably wouldn't make a difference anyway.

Even though I am vehemently against your viewpoints, you're all still good people (except Smackman; you've proven yourself as a douche).
Peace out, everyone.
User avatar
Zeus Kabob
Moderator
 
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:16 am
Location: Between some awesome thunderheads

Re: slaughter house

Postby Thee Pie Man » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:47 am

Zeus Kabob Wrote:AGH! I'M SO PISSED OFF.

I feel like I hear the same thing every time I talk about farming animals.

Some farms might use hormones. If you give a shit, don't buy meat from the farms that do. Maybe people don't care if their meat is treated with rBST! In that case, get up in arms when you're buying, don't say "abolish all farming!".

As for the babies: If all I could ever hope for from a baby was wailing, then I'd kill it without a second thought. The fact of the matter is that cows will never be anything more than cows, whereas babies are very likely to grow up into adults who are capable of speech.

I feel like there are so many things that I could write essays about here, things that the majority of others in this thread are talking about that I disagree with, but that would be too much reading for you, I am too tired to do it, and it probably wouldn't make a difference anyway.

Even though I am vehemently against your viewpoints, you're all still good people (except Smackman; you've proven yourself as a douche).
Peace out, everyone.


In order:
(Given that my post was really the only other post since yours and that I assumed you read everything else I am taking this comment aimed at me in general for my views.)

Well given that half your points I made a point of in my last post, I posted explanations that make most of your points seem repetitive. Which is one of the things you are being pissed about.

Some farms do use hormones. and I made a clear point in my post I do not eat that, or any meat that isn't Kosher. I never said to abolish all farming or all farmers are evil. Obviously I wouldn't even by Kosher if said fact is true. You kinda took what I said out of context. Aligned it with things you have heard before and then are trying to rip it apart. If you read my entire post in it's entirety it says things that most of your posts point to as "solutions" If you really had a problem with just hearing the same thing again and again then you honestly didn't even have to read it.

Again, you took my point out of context and it makes it seem like it's less then it was.
I literally said "So why should we feed them? Just to shut them up? But why? What makes us differentiate between an animal and another human being? Why is a human's life at any stage any more worth then another mammal? Is it the thinking of capacity of the child? That it can learn things that other animals can not? People can teach dogs to help people in need, when normally dogs would never do such a thing. Has anyone tried to do the same with cows, or chickens, or etc? I don't think so. Honestly we just see them as food so we don't even think about if they ARE capable of anything more then eating grass and producing harvestables." Which you neglected to even try to counter. Making my point that you don't even think of other animals being capable of more.. Seems ridiculous given we know NOTHING of how cows think. We can't tell. We aren't advanced enough to even have any technology like that. You make a judgement where you have no expertise. I may not have expertise in this either, but I can say that I have seen dogs help blind people across the street, help people around the house, from opening cabinets

I think i honestly do write essays :D XD

And you seem liked a good person, I just feel your views are not nice.. >.>
~Life is fragile thing, but also it can be hardening, it can be enduring, it can be sad, it can be happy. If things don't seem to be going your way at first, look forward and hold on to what you believe in, it can be one of the strongest things of all~
Thee Pie Man
 
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:25 am
Location: Dunken Donuts, "If they don't have pie I am killing someone."

Re: slaughter house

Postby Zeus Kabob » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:53 am

Ah, sorry. I certainly didn't read what you wrote in its entirety, because as you said in the end of paragraph 3, "if you really had a problem with just hearing the same thing again and again then you honestly didn't even have to read it". I obviously drew my conclusion too quickly.

As for paragraph 4; we have. There have been extensive experiments on cows, and they're dumb as hell. Dogs are extremely special in that they can communicate with humans as much as they can. We know a lot about how capable cows are of thought. We are advanced enough to run experiments. You may say "What if the cows are simply non-compliant?", but non-compliancy is as good as non-intelligence for the purposes you're suggesting.

I feel we have similar views, but a few key differences make our two viewpoints seem as divergent as they do.

It was fun talking with you.
User avatar
Zeus Kabob
Moderator
 
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:16 am
Location: Between some awesome thunderheads

Re: slaughter house

Postby Thee Pie Man » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:16 pm

Zeus Kabob Wrote:Ah, sorry. I certainly didn't read what you wrote in its entirety, because as you said in the end of paragraph 3, "if you really had a problem with just hearing the same thing again and again then you honestly didn't even have to read it". I obviously drew my conclusion too quickly.

As for paragraph 4; we have. There have been extensive experiments on cows, and they're dumb as hell. Dogs are extremely special in that they can communicate with humans as much as they can. We know a lot about how capable cows are of thought. We are advanced enough to run experiments. You may say "What if the cows are simply non-compliant?", but non-compliancy is as good as non-intelligence for the purposes you're suggesting.

I feel we have similar views, but a few key differences make our two viewpoints seem as divergent as they do.

It was fun talking with you.


It's fine.

As far as the cow's intelligence go I will just leave it as "We need better technology for better results" *shrugs* I like to be a hundred percent sure on matters like that.

I think we do as well.

It was fun talking to you too, have a nice day.
~Life is fragile thing, but also it can be hardening, it can be enduring, it can be sad, it can be happy. If things don't seem to be going your way at first, look forward and hold on to what you believe in, it can be one of the strongest things of all~
Thee Pie Man
 
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:25 am
Location: Dunken Donuts, "If they don't have pie I am killing someone."

Re: slaughter house

Postby talin » Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:17 pm

@ TPM,
I'm not saying anything you said was wrong but you did claim you did research but you neglected to give us links despite asking ren for them yourself (which I would second) That being said, your points do seem to make sense (it's much cheaper to farm wheat/corn, I've heard of the whole 'bread is bad' thing before but considering that we've been using bread for centuries to make a variety of foods and drinks. Ironically, ancient beer recipes were suppose to be mineral rich and nutritious (one Egyptian beer recipe was proven to have a "miracle" antibiotic in it according to the documentary "how beer saved the world") as well as bread being a key part in almost everyone's diet. I'm not sure if barely and wheat are 2 different types of grain but barely is suppose to be very healthy. I'll go look around for some links and stuff for this but I would like it if you and ren did the same. :)

Ugh, failed to find anything conclusive but tbh I don't think I looked that hard...
Last edited by talin on Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
What is a goal but an attempt to gain a purpose? We don't really want the goals and advancements for themselves, we want them because it gives us a reason to act.
RP DnD roller: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/dice/dice.htm
User avatar
talin
 
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 2:14 am
Location: Laptops can go almost anywhere.

Re: slaughter house

Postby BlueLight » Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:41 pm

Food like bread was used because it was fulfilling when you ate, I mean who here eats a full meal of something like apples and doesn't eat something like bread or pasta?
User avatar
BlueLight
Gangs n' Whores Developer
 
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:23 am

Re: slaughter house

Postby Zeus Kabob » Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:44 am

Bread isn't used because it's filling. It's used because it's cheap. Cereal grains were used across the board because of their ease of farming, not because of their nutritional value.
User avatar
Zeus Kabob
Moderator
 
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:16 am
Location: Between some awesome thunderheads

Re: slaughter house

Postby BlueLight » Tue Apr 17, 2012 5:44 am

Zeus Kabob Wrote:Bread isn't used because it's filling. It's used because it's cheap. Cereal grains were used across the board because of their ease of farming, not because of their nutritional value.

thats my point.
User avatar
BlueLight
Gangs n' Whores Developer
 
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:23 am

Re: slaughter house

Postby Thee Pie Man » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:44 am

talin Wrote:@ TPM,
I'm not saying anything you said was wrong but you did claim you did research but you neglected to give us links despite asking ren for them yourself (which I would second) That being said, your points do seem to make sense (it's much cheaper to farm wheat/corn, I've heard of the whole 'bread is bad' thing before but considering that we've been using bread for centuries to make a variety of foods and drinks. Ironically, ancient beer recipes were suppose to be mineral rich and nutritious (one Egyptian beer recipe was proven to have a "miracle" antibiotic in it according to the documentary "how beer saved the world") as well as bread being a key part in almost everyone's diet. I'm not sure if barely and wheat are 2 different types of grain but barely is suppose to be very healthy. I'll go look around for some links and stuff for this but I would like it if you and ren did the same. :)

Ugh, failed to find anything conclusive but tbh I don't think I looked that hard...


Well first of all I never heard that story, interesting to say the least. Well not from any research just from the top of my head I think the reference "Beer Belly" kinda shows what maybe the link between bear and wheat ;) Although I am tired right now and may if you request, go look to see if it's not good either. I would imagine it's fine in moderation. Still wouldn't be great for you though. I mean in my mind.. (do not read if you get offended when people speaks badly about beer drinkers. That's not what I am trying to do.)
Spoiler (click to show/hide):

the idea of beer for people is so they can get that "buzz" they don't buy it as far as I am aware for the taste of one or two, but several to five in a sitting while they watch the game or play pool or whatever else. I have nothing against people that drink, however I do believe in moderation and people that get drunk on purpose just seem imbecilic in my view.


Alright, I will do as you ask :L

It's usually referred to on the "primal or Paleo diet" which as I was saying before my mom is on and now is losing weight insanely fast and it makes me really happy to see her as happy as she is now.

These are some links to sites you can explore and find out more for yourself ^^ (I am being lazy at 2:30 in the morning, sue me)
Here is some on primal diets:
http://www.livestrong.com/article/222538-primal-diet/
http://www.marksdailyapple.com/primal-blueprint-101/#axzz1sNmh67iG

and here is some on Paleo diets (only slight differences but the main point about grains (especially gluten ones) are in both):
http://thepaleodiet.com/ <-- A bit more reserved, more preppy
http://nerdfitness.com/blog/2010/10/04/the-beginners-guide-to-the-paleo-diet/ <-- A bit more straight forward, kinda "This is a guy that's tried it and it's worked" kinda deal. Both I think are decent sources. Have fun~

Now I never said it was easy, honestly it's a hard thing to do, to eat Primal/Paleo. Because so many of our foods contain Gluten and other processed things that are bad for you. *shrugs* but spreading the message wouldn't hurt I believe, take from it what you will, and good luck to anyone that decides to change their lifestyle.

As a final note I want to make sure everyone understands that I perused the sites to make sure they had a decent amount of information and weren't virus'd. They are not the sites I personally used for research because my mom actually gave me other sites but we both forgot where they were :P We printed off sheets that told us the "what you can and can not eat" stuff and that's all we really needed, I hope these sites will work fine.
~Life is fragile thing, but also it can be hardening, it can be enduring, it can be sad, it can be happy. If things don't seem to be going your way at first, look forward and hold on to what you believe in, it can be one of the strongest things of all~
Thee Pie Man
 
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:25 am
Location: Dunken Donuts, "If they don't have pie I am killing someone."

Re: slaughter house

Postby kaibunny94 » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:47 pm

I go for the vegetarian option simply because we can easily survive without meat and so why kill things for it?
I know its a fairly pants view but I think in some ways the simplier ones are the easiest to grasp and translate more globally.
When it's all over we will arise, from the ashes of your worthless fucking pity. We'll make a name for ourselves, by ourselves, we'll watch the stars come down to leave this city. Sacramento is Dead
User avatar
kaibunny94
 
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:58 pm
Location: Half way between one mindset and another....but mostly depressionville.


Return to General



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users