Altkenis Wrote:Kattlarv:
I myself prefer the neatly tucked-in genitalia resulting from good genetics.
It's up to the creators after all, so why would they draw anything less than ideal?
Firstly: The fuck is up with your "good genetics" ramble?
On that note: The "loli vag" is pretty shit tier, generics wise. As they have high risk of getting UTI's. It's a bit like arguing that anorexia is a "result of good generics". Granted, a flat vag isn't nearly as much of a health hazard. But, was just trying to make a comparison to that ridiculous statement.
Secondly: No. Roughly only around 5 % of adult women have the "loli vag". A majority is in the 0-5 cm bracket however.
You can make the same argument that a flat chested woman is "just genetics".
And: Men are more attracted to big, veiny dicks, than to pussy. So, that argument isn't very compelling. For the vast majority of human history, pubic hair and large labia has been "the ideal". Just because some porn producer in the end of the 19'th century decided to make the least common pussy design "the ideal" in order to make cocks seem bigger, along with ensuring they had around the only supply of the "perfect" pussy, is literally just pulled out of your ass.
You're doing the equivalent of picking up a Chihuahua and going "This is the best, most attractive type of dog. Its a result of purely good genetics." completely ignoring cultural influence and personal preferences.
And yes, wow. People would quit the game unless the antagonist is a pure copy paste of the main character. A re-skin of Krystal is what everyone is playing for.
And: Seriously: What is the problem with your type of people? Literally your only argument always circles back to "There are only TWO options in the universe: This loli vag, the pussy type I was raised to find attractive, and is the only one I know. Or: A 12 inch eldritch abomination covered with slime, tentacles and that rips the heart out of babies. There's nothing in between." mind the piss take, but: for real. Why do your kind act like there's always only two options? You do know that gradients exist, so to speak?
@HeruSolares: The idea is pretty decent. Feels a bit many extra steps. But, I can totally see it be a thing.
Would need some fluff to make sense, but def doable.
